Honduras, alone against the world
If there are deaths in Honduras tomorrow, it will be the fault of false reports on the part of CNN en Español, particularly Krupskia Alis. CNN is called Chávez News Network here in Honduras.
CNN has a segment called 'keeping them honest'. Who checks on CNN? They will call my claim ridiculous, but there are hundreds of thousands of people in Honduras who know the truth because they watch CNN even though up until tonight's report, they have claimed that CNN was blocked from view in Honduras. Check CNN's iReports and all over the internet and you will read the same plea, "tell the truth about what is happening here!"
Equally responsible will be the United Nations and the Organization of American States. Those organizations claim to be concerned about democracy, yet they have judged and condemned Honduras without any chance to explain what happened or why the government officials believe what they have done was constitutional. None.It's ironic that on the very day that US Americans celebrate their independence, their government was party to forcing a tyrant upon the Republic of Honduras.
Can people in the United States be condemned with the judge and jury denying a defendant a chance to defend himself? Can you imagine if the OAS told your Supreme Court to reverse a decision or told you that you had to keep a corrupt president? This action is as barbaric as they claim the golpistas are. Those organizations also claim to be concerned about the human rights of Honduran citizens, but they, with the support of the United States of America, ignore the wishes of the Honduran citizens by trying to force upon them an inept, corrupt, drug-taking president who is said to have ties with narcotrafficking. How can this be? Isn't the United States against drug trafficking?
Also, it seems that if they were truly concerned with the human rights of our citizens, they would not stand by silent while Hugo Chávez of Venezuela threatens to spill blood in our streets. Oh, well, I guess they think that as long as we have TV and no curfew, we'll be free!
The Secretary General of the OAS, José Manuel Insulza, is much more concerned with the damaged dignity of one person, than damaging the future security of 7.5 million people in the second poorest country in this hemisphere. In only six days, our new leaders have uncovered US $31 million of misused funds and found that the President has put the country into a level of debt never seen before. In the six days that he was gone, he ran up a debt of US $80,000 on his government credit card. That amount alone would have fed 32 families for a year.Our new president has told us that no citizen is above the law in our country. That hasn't been true in the past in Honduras, but this time citizens feel empowered and they are going to hold their president to his word. Despite the threat from Ecuador and Nicaragua, our leaders have said that Mel Zelaya will be arrested tomorrow when he lands in Honduras.
But it won't happen without violence. Groups of criminals and thugs, some who have entered the country illegally from Nicaragua, have been terrorizing Tegucigalpa, encouraged by the CNN en Español reporter, who ignores the hundred thousand peaceful marchers all over Honduras, just as CNN in the US ignores the thousands of internet postings from Hondurans asking for fair coverage. Unless the Honduran military can perform a miracle, people will be hurt or killed tomorrow, July 5, 2009.Hondurans thought of the United States as a friend. Most thought that they would be supported, not condemned, for their fight for democracy against a tyrant who ignored the laws and constitution and called our highest court "the Supreme Court of Injustice".
Honduras is small, but proud, sovereign country. Honduras will stand alone against the world for as long as it can. Its citizens will be prouder of themselves and their government than they ever have been before. And they will find out who the true friends of democracy are.









25 comments:
Hey LG,
Feeling your pain. We just saw the OEA meeting and it's heartbreaking to see the farse that's being perpetuated by mel Zelaya and the rest of the OEA clowns. What has happened to the world? Why has Honduras been abandoned? Are we being punished simply because this corrupt President was flown to Costa Rica in his PJ's? Your blog has been the only thing keeping me sane since I know that there's another expat out there feeling my pain. As an American, I am disappointed in my government, in my media, and in the international reaction. What a huge failure. Tomorrow, when Mel comes to the airport, I hope that he is handcuffed on the spot.
Amen!
No, the US doesn't care about drug trafficking.
See:
The golden crescent.
Eugene Hasenfus.
Mena, Arkansas.
Laotian opium fields.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8681225708920427234
The list goes on.
BOO! I'm gonna go court a kankaroo!
Are you going to censor this one too?
LG,
I just read the AFP news on Yahoo in Canada and that is a pro Mel report. It only show photo of Mel's supporter and mentioning thousands of his supporters from the rural areas went to Tegusigalpa and some were being detained by the military and beaten up. I am shocked how facts are being twisted and where AFP got their "reliable" sources. Do they understand the implications of these accusations can do so much image damamge where it will only deepen the misunderstanding ? Sadly, where were all these caring people before this had happened ? Why OAS, EU and UN not bring their deligates to see hoe rural Honduras is ? Why condemn those who took action ? I know almost all politicians steal but just a matter of how much but when Mel is too extreme, thinking he is above the law, taking no for an answer then that is what he has to face. Now he wants to return to Honduras for what ? Who wants a president so stupid and corrupted to be their head until the next one is elected ?
Hi LG,
I went back to several sites and found that ALL pro MEL protesters covered their faces and the printed cardboards they carry in thier hands are definitely provided by a well organized group of people outside of Honduras because if they are farmers from such poor areas, where did all these well printed colour posters come from ? If they are Hondurans, why cover their faces ? Look at pro Micheleitti people. All wearing white and blue, very proudly showing their faces they are Hondurans wanting peace. Also, most of Mel's supporters are leftist. I saw signs that say "FMLN" from Salvador. This is an internal affair in Honduras so why are these neighbouring leftist so keen to get involve in Honduras politics ?? If I am an ordinary citizen in Canada is able to spot and see the differences and is having doubts, scratching my head, why OAS, EU, UN and USA with intelligent , educated advisors can't see these ?
We agree with you and can only offer apologies for our US policy. I'm trying my best to get the word out. We are praying for you guys!
I support what Honduras has done in getting Mel out and felt it was absolutely necessary.
But, in your statement, LG,:
"Equally responsible will be the United Nations and the Organization of American States. Those organizations claim to be concerned about democracy, yet they have judged and condemned Honduras without any chance to explain what happened..."
I read that the OAS official came here and talked to many officials about what happened. Do you mean to imply that they did not give him all the facts?
Granted, the OAS may have come with a mind set and dismissed anything that was relayed to them for, as I read in a statement by Christopher Sabatini who said during an interview with Ray Suarez on OnLine News Hour (http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/latin_america/july-dec09/honduras2_07-02.html):
"But we should not mistake the fact that a democratic institution, whether it's a president, elected president, or a supreme court or a congress, can overstep the bounds of institutionality, which is exactly what happened, and simply packing up a president, sending him out of the office, without any -- is what the OAS has defined -- and this is international law; it's not Honduran law -- is an alteration in the constitutional process and needs, under OAS regulations and under regional law, needs to be condemned as a coup d'etat."
So, if Honduran officials gave OAS all the facts and they removed the country from their organization, it must be because they are standing behind their "laws" and "international laws" and ignoring any laws that are in effect in Honduras with relation to this matter.
If that is so, then, no Honduras will stand alone as other organizations see if as a breach of their laws....or maybe I'm mis-readidng this.
Do you know what "international or OAS laws this gentlemen is speaking about?
Guanaja Sharon
Hi Guanaja Sharon,
OAS did not go to Honduras to find facts. They are telling Honduras Supreme Court and Congress what is the consequences if they do not reinstate Mel. They did not come to find facts. They came with their own OAS Article 21 but they do not respect the articles of the Honduras law. I am not Honduran and I am boiling mad. It is like I am telling you what my house rules are and you must obey otherwise, I will not give you more cookies. You are trying to tell me," Hey I have my own rules in my house. I do not need your house rules to tell me how to run my own household !" It is very simple because they do not want to see the same happening to them, the equally worrisome corrupted Presidents in Latin Americas.
I am glad that you are keeping us better posted..thanks and I hope the people of Honduras will be able to fight off the other governments who are trying to tell them what to do
I was tuned in online to the OAS meeting on Honduras, listening on and off, when I heard a phrase to the effect, "We cannot allow dictatorships [in Honduras/Latin America]." At first, I thought, oh good, at least that country recognizes that Mel should not return. But then I realized the speaker was referring to the current Micheletti government. How ironic, even more so in the face of the latest information regarding misused funds, lavish spending and credit card debts.
If, as everyone says, Zelaya was unpopular, what makes people think he'd be re-elected, assuming that a) the non-binding resolution was held; b) it passed, and c) by some magical process the Honduran legislature held a Constitutional convention between now and November and d) made a change that would have allowed for re-election and e) Mel won?
If, as people claim, the coup was popular then why a) was an abrogation of civil rights necessry?, b) why have elected officials (like the alcalde mayor of San Pedro Sula) disappeared, c)why has the Army had to shoot up buses carrying protesters, d)why is the Chamber of Commerce "requesting" tax-deductable donations to finance pro-coup protests (and where in the Honduran tax code are such "donations" considered an allowable expense?), d) why have several HONDURAN journalists ended up dead in the last few days, e) why is the "government" afraid of foreign journalists and restricting their movements, f)why has the foreign ministry come out with easily disprovable statements of support from nations like Taiwan, and on and on and on....
Nobody cares about Mel Zelaya's political future (and he probably doesn't have one), but they do care about legality and international law. Allowing a coup to settle a political problem in one state justifies using extra-legal methods to resolve political issues in all states. Honduras was one of the signatories of the 2001 Interamerican Democratic Charter and is a member state of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. To claim the OAS action is about Zelaya is nonsense. It's about the rights of all of us in the Americas.
LG-thank you for giving us the real deal and debunking the polital speak we hear every day on CNN.
You're so right! I'm so thankful for your blog --- I left Honduras last week and have been reading articles in the NY Times and LA Times to keep up on what's happening --- but they're totally missing the news! It's sooo frustrating! I'm telling everyone who wants to REALLY know what's going on in Honduras to read your blog! Please keep up the good work!!!
LG,
So you will know, not all Americans support the despicable president we currently have.
There are more freedom loving Americans supporting Honduras and the rule of law, than you know.
My very best wishes to our ally and friend, Honduras.
May today bring peace and freedom.
By no2liberals.
I am so embarrased by the US government. I am strongly behind what is happening to Honduras and pray that you will succeed in your endeavors
I can't understand why Obama and Hilary are backing Chavez! More blood for oil???
I can't believe the biased news reporting,either. It's hard to have faith in any news source, now. I did see a good rebuttal by Ambassador Roger Noriega on Jim Lehrer's newshour:
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/latin_america/july-dec09/honduras2_07-02.html
We are with you in spirit, LG
As an American, I am ashamed of my so-called "Democracy-loving" President. I stand in solidarity with Hondurans who reject these cult-of-personality Presidente-for-life characters. It is clear to me that Obama's long term plans in the States are the same as Zelaya's in Honduras: to change the Constitution and remove all barriers to lifetime rule.
Hang in there. Tyrants only last so long.
33 nations united to say -
Shooting up a presidents house...
Arresting him at gunpoint...
And flying him into exile was wrong...
The world does not want to see coups...
The key issue here is...
A coup occurred in Honduras...
As painful this is for all of us...
There was a simple solution...
All Michelletti had to do was arrest Zelaya...
Then present to the world the 18 arrest warrants...
Even Hillary Clinton said she wanted to know why Zelaya was exiled...
But even Clinton said Zelaya is the president of Honduras...
Obama said the same...
Why all the fuss about Zelaya...
Nothing new has been discovered...
No dark secrets have been uncovered...
Corrupt Honduran presidents are the norm in Honduras...
Ex pres Callejas U.S. visa was canceled...
Accused by the USA for corruption...
After Honduras did not bring charges against Callejas for corruption...
Honduras has been at the top of the list as the most corrupt country in Central America for years...
Why are there more than one million Hondurans working stateside...
Zelaya is not responsible for this...
Zelaya is part of the problem...
All the ex Honduran presidents combined are responsible for the imposed poverty in Honduras...
The Honduran Constitution favors the rich...
The Honduran Constitution does not favor democracy...
Proof...
One million plus Hondurans stateside...
Ask your Honduran neighbor when is the last time she has seen her husband...
Or her son...
Who are stateside...
This revolution has been building for over a decade La Gringa...
Liberal party presidential candidate Elvin Santos has appeared on television in favor of Zelaya...
All the staged pro Michelletti demonstrations we have seen over the last several days...
Will be nothing like what you will see today When Zelaya arrives in Teguc...
I doubt you will see anything...
I am sure there will be a blackout...
As you wave your flag cheering for democracy...
The Liberal party are people who live in the rural - mountain areas of Honduras...
Today is their day...
Remember...
The people are the law...
The people have the last word...
Let the people decide...
Ok, if what you're saying is true, it's horrible! But you need to back it up! You need people who have HAD horrible things done to them to talk about it, people who KNOW, sources.
It's way to easy to get caught up in this idea that the president is a horrible person, but unless you have proof what you're saying won't carry any weight.
There is always two sides to every story, and to make this side of it jump off the page, you need proof. Just claiming all this stuff is happening isn't going to cut it.
Get people to go on record, get photos, get people high up in the government if possible.
Just trying to help you out. No one will listen or pay attention if you all just sound like angry teenagers with no proof of your claims.
It is of my opinion that God has chosen one of the weakest, poorest country to expose to the world who is who.....it is a wide open exposure...as far as organizations, media, individuals and presidents........the blind can see now......
To Richard Graham,
Zelaya is not being charged of trying to alter term limits. He is being acused of trying to usurp powers that belongs exclusively to the Honduran Congress, namely the prerogative to amend the constitution. The fact that the poll is unbinding is irrelevant, as the CSJ has warned him in many ocasions, because the article about the inviolability of the constitution forbids any officer to even promote such an idea. Now, clearly, he was promoting that idea, or anyone can argue that he was hoping that the "NO" would win?
So, the fact that it was unbinding or the fact that he was not going to succed in staying in power is irrelevant.
To try to change the constitution (or even promoting this idea) bypassing the Congress constitutes the crime of TREASON, something clearly stated in the constitution.
When it was public and notorius that he intended to go ahead with his pooll (something that the SCJ had established before and warned him about at least twice would constituted the crime of treason)the AG denounce him to the SCJ.
In most countries that would not be possible, because the president would have to be impeached before the SCJ could accept the denounce. However, the constitution of Honduras does not provides for an impeachment process. So, to say that the SCJ could not accept the decision would be equivalent to say that the President is untouchable and, in fact, above the law. This is clearly absurd and unconstitutional.
So the AG denuonced him, asking for (1) secret of justice in order to prevent him from leaving the country or obstructing justice (as he was doing before by disregarding court orders), (2) the suspension of his powers as president and (3) his judicial detention. The Court accepted the AG demands and, since they were talking about the President and the Constitutional alloows for the cooperation between the military and the police in Honduras, ordered the military to have him arrest.
Note that the Court has not made its final decision yet, they are just starting the process. He will have a due process. He will haved the chance to defend himself. He will have a chance to get an habeas corpus. And, in the unlikely event of them founding him not guilty, maybe he can return (I am not sure about that)
Forcing him to leave the country was ilegal. But that is imaterial to the charges against him. If a court order your arrest and the police beats you all the way to jail, this does not absolves you. He can sue the oficials that comited those crimes, but he cannot avoid his arrest or return to power because of that.
As for why they suspended some individual rights, note that the constitution establishes that that can be done in the face of grave risk to peace. I would say that the situation falls into that condition. As for the murderings, disapearence, etc. 2 things: first, again, that that is imaterial to the SCJ order to suspend his power and arrest him, second, I bet that if you follow the line from where that information is coming from you will reach telesur, the state owned television from Venezuela. You are free to believe in whoever you wants (as am I, LG and everybody else).
You can find the documents about the SCJ, including the denounce from the AG in the Supreme Court website (somehow I can't paste the link here, ti is not worling)
I rest my case.
WHO "YOU" M.Y.?
-- The OAS, toothless as it usually is, doesn't take an action like it did lightly. To say it didn't speak to people is to miss (or intentionally overlook) the procedings, all of which are public record. Also, since all 33 member states voted the same way, it's hard to claim that somehow Hugo Chavez influenced every state in the Hemisphere's foreign policy. Colombia? Peru? Canada? The United States? Please...
-- Disappearces and deaths are being recorded by Amnesty International (another organization supposedly under Chavez' influence, I s'pose) and other reliable organziations. Also publically available information.
-- The Committe to Protect Journalists and Jouralists Without Frontiers (the latter, supposedly, financed by anti-Castro elements in Florida) both have documented repression against the journalists, and murder of Honduran journalists. This too is public record, though it will be difficult to get the dead reporters to speak to the press at this point.
Reporters can only report with the information they are given. Yes, there are biases (one reason I've been checking pro- and anti-coup sources) and there is no way those who are in denial about a coup are either purposely not checking their sources, or discounting what disagrees with their pre-conceptions.
There's nothing wrong with posting one's opinions (I do!), but there is something misguided about misusing facts (or, overlooking inconvenient facts) to claim those opinions are objective truth.
Richard, not one death has occurred in Honduras as a result of the legal removal of Zelaya, not one. You are either doing the same thing the Chavistas are, making things up so that sound believable knowing that most people will not check the veracity of them or you are just passing on the lies of others.
Who is dead? Names, ages, locations? The only documented attacks that I have seen occurred by the pro-Zelaya supporters, not the government.
What people did the OAS speak to, other than Chavez and Zelaya? They only visited Honduras to try and demand Zelaya's reinstatement.
Everything Honduras did was legal by their constitution. It may not be your constitution, or even a particularly good one, but it was legal. Article 42 strips Zelaya of citizenship for what he was trying to do, which invalidates him as president (and which allows him to be exiled--although that was an incredibly stupid move, although perhaps needed). Article 239 immediately removes him from office for even attempting to promote what he did. He fully knew this.
Why did Chavez provide the ballots? Why would he stick his nose in the politics of another country?
The OAS has not once said or done anything about Chavez using the Venezuelan constitution as his own personal toilet paper. They reinstated a Cuba that is in direct violation of so many democratic principles that it isn't funny.
Our own socialist-in-chief has a peculiar brand of foreign relations. His idea of restoring the US good name (and we could use a bit of rehabilitation) is bend-overism. He's going along with mob rule.
Chavez, Arias, Correa, Ortega and Morales have a serious interest in what happens in Honduras because they fear it in their own countries. If Honduras can free itself of a president that tries to disregard the constitution, what is to prevent their own countrymen from doing the same?
I'm curious as to why people on the side of Zelaya can easily ignore the repeated constitutional violations and demand that a caudillo wannabe be reinstated? Article 42 (4) also applies because he has admitted publicly to buying votes to get elected. That is electoral fraud and also costs him his citizen's rights. Search LG's archives for the article so that you can see that I am not making anything up.
Read the Honduran constitution and you will see that they acted under the cover of the constitution. Are they mostly corrupt? Sure, but that doesn't mean what they did was illegal.
oh, TeleSURtv.net is from Venezuela, well it is the only life video from Tegus-airport that I can find on the Internet.
Are there other sites with live-video?
In spite of Obama's response in typical collectivist fashion to the constitutional action to restore the republic in Honduras, Congressman Connie Mack of Florida has proposed a resolution to condemn the socialist dictator usurper Zelaya and uphold the right of The Honduran people to live according to their constitution. I doubt it will get far in the Congress, but even if it did, The United States as a sovereign country ought to be able to recognize the right of other sovereign countries and not side the the Anti God United Nations and EU. Frankly I am so EMBARRASSED by this truly piss poor example of a president in Obama, who is neither a statesman, nor a freedom fighter. He too is a collectivist usurper, and so we patriots consider the source and work all the more to oust him ASAP.
Post a Comment
Go ahead! Don't be shy. Tell us what you think. But please, be civil.